Enterprise Schema Architecture: Building for the Algorithmic Trinity

Jason Barnard Interviews Andrea Volpini

Kalicube® CEO Jason Barnard speaks with Andrea Volpini, who founded WordLift in 2017 to build enterprise Knowledge Graph infrastructure - a decade before the world understood why it mattered. Today, WordLift manages schema for enterprises with tens of thousands of products across multiple markets, treating @id management with the same sacred governance as domain names. We discuss why enterprise-scale schema architecture fails without this level of rigour, and what the AI era demands.

---

Jason Barnard: Andrea, you’ve been building for the semantic web since 2017. That’s over a decade of enterprise Knowledge Graph infrastructure - before most companies knew what a Knowledge Graph was, before ChatGPT existed, before anyone was talking about AI Overviews.

WordLift was betting on structured data mattering at scale when the rest of the industry was still counting backlinks. What did you see that others missed?

Andrea Volpini: We saw early that the web was evolving from documents to entities. Search engines weren’t just going to index pages - they were going to understand concepts, relationships, meaning. We built WordLift to help enterprises structure their content for that future.

The fundamental thesis proved correct. What’s changed is the stakes.

Jason Barnard: Explain what you mean by the stakes changing.

Andrea Volpini: In 2017, schema markup might get you a rich snippet. Nice to have. In 2026, your entity representation determines whether AI systems recommend you at all.

The Algorithmic Trinity you’ve described - Knowledge Graphs, LLMs, and Search Engines working together - that’s now operational reality. ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity need structured data to “see” your products. Without that architecture, you don’t exist in AI conversations.

Jason Barnard: You’ve described schema as “curriculum for machines” - structured lessons that teach AI systems why they should recommend a brand. That framing resonates with something I’ve been teaching since 2017: algorithms are children that want to understand. Same pedagogical insight, different application.

Andrea Volpini: Exactly. We don’t think of structured data as a technical trick to get rich snippets. It’s education. The same way you’d teach a child: consistent, clear, patient repetition.

For an enterprise with 50,000 products across 12 countries, that means every single product @id must remain persistent and authoritative. Every relationship is mapped correctly. Every hierarchy is maintained.

Jason Barnard: That scale challenge is what I want to dig into. At Kalicube, we focus on entity foundation - the identity layer. Does the Knowledge Graph understand who the brand is? Is the Entity Home established? We’ve optimised over 5,000 entities.

But when clients come to me with enterprise ecommerce complexity - 50,000 products, multiple markets, complex corporate hierarchies - I know that’s beyond what foundational work alone can solve.

What does WordLift actually do at that scale that makes @id continuity maintainable?

Andrea Volpini: Three things that break human-managed systems:

First, automated precision. When you’re managing tens of thousands of products across multiple countries and languages, you cannot rely on humans to maintain @id consistency manually. One developer “cleaning up” identifiers can sever thousands of entity chains simultaneously.

Second, relationship mapping. We’re not just connecting products to keywords. We’re connecting them to parent organisations, to reviews, to specific consumer intents within a Knowledge Graph. The relationships are as important as the entities themselves.

Third, migration safety. When an enterprise replatforms - WordPress to Shopify, Magento to Salesforce Commerce Cloud - we ensure the @ids map correctly. Old identifiers resolve to new ones. The Algorithmic Blockchain stays intact.

Jason Barnard: That migration piece is where I see the most catastrophic failures. I’ve started calling schema migration “the site migration of the AI era” because the risks are parallel - but the recovery timeline is worse.

Site migration recovery: 3-6 months. Schema migration recovery: 12-24 months minimum. And there’s no Search Console equivalent telling you the entity chain broke.

Andrea Volpini: That’s exactly the pain point we address. A botched site migration loses traffic. A botched schema migration severs the Algorithmic Blockchain - the term you coined. The entity’s historical trust chain is gone.

For enterprise clients, we’re the safety net. We treat @id management with the same sacred governance as domain names. You don’t change your domain casually. You shouldn’t change your entity identifiers casually either.

Jason Barnard: How do you diagnose when a client comes to you with an existing schema that’s already broken?

Andrea Volpini: We check Google’s Knowledge Graph API. Often we find technically valid schema pointing to entities that don’t exist coherently. The @ids are correct syntax. The markup validates. But the entity is fragmented, confused, or absent.

The client has 50,000 products with beautiful structured data, but the parent Organisation entity - the brand itself - isn’t clearly established. All those product relationships anchor to nothing.

Jason Barnard: Schema without entity foundation is building a skyscraper on sand.

Andrea Volpini: Exactly your phrase. And this is why we often refer clients to Kalicube first. The foundational work - establishing the Entity Home, building corroboration across trusted sources, teaching algorithms who the brand actually is - that has to happen before enterprise architecture makes sense.

Jason Barnard: The Kalicube Process™ systematises that foundation. But the foundation alone can’t scale to enterprise complexity. That’s the layer divide.

Andrea Volpini: Layer 1: entity foundation - that’s Kalicube’s domain. Does the Knowledge Graph understand who you are?

Layer 2: entity architecture - that’s WordLift’s domain. How do you scale that identity across your entire digital presence? Maintain @id continuity across platforms and markets? Monitor entity health at scale?

Skip Layer 1, and Layer 2 builds on nothing. Ignore Layer 2, and Layer 1 can’t scale.

Jason Barnard: The brands that win do both.

Andrea Volpini: We’ve been working in adjacent spaces since 2013 - WordLift on semantic architecture, Kalicube on entity optimisation. The work converges more every year as the Algorithmic Trinity becomes the governing framework of digital visibility.

Jason Barnard: For enterprises reading this - what’s your advice on where to start?

Andrea Volpini: Start with identity. Before schema architecture, ask: Do algorithms know who we are? Check your Knowledge Panel. Ask ChatGPT about your brand. If the answer is confused or wrong - fix that first.

Then think of scale. How do you extend that identity across your product catalogue, your corporate structure, your content ecosystem? That’s when you need architectural infrastructure. That’s when you need professional-grade systems that maintain @id continuity regardless of platform changes.

Jason Barnard: Entity first, architecture second.

Andrea Volpini: Always. The AI systems are ready to learn. They’re your untrained sales force - ChatGPT, Google, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini - talking to your prospects every day. Your job is to train them. Clearly, consistently, with infrastructure that maintains identity over time.

Without that training, they’re either silent about your brand or selling for your competitors.

Jason Barnard: Andrea, this has been exactly the conversation I hoped for. Thank you.

Andrea Volpini: Thank you, Jason. The industry needs this vocabulary.

---